I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Сайт Роскомнадзора атаковали18:00
。快连下载安装对此有专业解读
第一百三十条 行政拘留的处罚决定被撤销，行政拘留处罚开始执行，或者出所后继续执行的，公安机关收取的保证金应当及时退还交纳人。
Jimmy Kimmel wasn't a fan of Donald Trump's State of the Union address, but it sounds as though plenty of right-wing politicians and talking heads were.
Universities have seen funding cuts from the government, making it harder for the 47-year-old to find the kind of work that used to be supported by grant programmes.